Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Battle III 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Penn Battle III
Spinning
72.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.73 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 3000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 520g / 18,34oz and a ergonomics of 5.93 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
