Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (5,5kg / 12,13lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a ball bearings of 7, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
