Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
