Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (4.7). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
