Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Aero BB
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Shimano Aero BB C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Aero BB C3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Aero BB?
Shimano Aero BB C3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
