Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
