Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
