Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
