Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
