Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX
