Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
