Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
