Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X
