Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X
