Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano Sienna 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sienna?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Sienna 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
