Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Stradic FM
Spinning
1000fmx
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Stradic FM?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
