Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
