Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
