Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
