Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Shimano Sedona 500 FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona 500 FI stands out for a gear ratio of 5.6:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X
