Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.55 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X
