Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24.02 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX
