Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
