Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
