Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 39.0 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
