Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (4.7:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
