Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
