Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
