Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
