Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
