Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
