Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
