Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X
