Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
