Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
