Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
66.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a ball bearings of 7, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
