Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
83.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
