Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
