Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
