Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
64.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.7:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
