Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
