Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX
