Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
64.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7584oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29528 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €64.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
