Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31496 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Aero C3000X
