Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 6500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 6500X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 535g / 18,87oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa BG?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa BG 6500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
