Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 8000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight850g / 29.98oz
Line retireve per crank135 centimeter / 53.15 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/500
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 8000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 535g / 18,87oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa BG?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa BG 8000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
