Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
