Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
