Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
