Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa RX LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
