Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 5000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (535g / 18,87oz). While Delphin IXTREK 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin IXTREK?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin IXTREK 5000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
