Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
65.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 535g / 18,87oz and a ergonomics of 5.91 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
