Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (4.7). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
