Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
