Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
